Last week we got all riled up about the Baggers and their violence. Maybe we started to feel a little afraid for our country, our future. What did it mean that these crazies were so willing to commit actual crimes as a way of expressing their political views?
In the words of one progressive talk show host: nothing. I wish to god I could remember which one it was, but I listen to so many that they start to run together. It was either Ed Schultz, Corey Farley, or Thom Hartmann. This beloved host was saying that no, this is not a real movement. No, the Baggers are not a majority, they do not represent the party. And as I listened, I felt hopeful again.
Yes, I'm too cynical to truly believe it, but it did make me consider how big (or small) this movement actually might be. Progressive Host said, in effect, that Baggers are just a bunch of freaks out on the fringe. That even though the GOP leadership was egging these folks on, their numbers really aren't that high. That at the end of the day, most Americans will say "wtf?" and decide they don't really enjoy tea.
I really, really want to believe this is true. No matter what may be the matter with Kansas, the deeply-buried optimist in me just can't believe that there are that many idiots in the country. Because at the end of the day, I have faith in humanity: faith that people, even if all they have is Fox News and similar ilk, will just pull a W and listen to their guts. And when they do, they'll realize something stinks, big time. You don't need no book lernin' to know when sumthin ain't no good.
Progressive Host also pointed out that the only other time in our history that we had a movement so devoted to protecting the corporate bastards was......the Civil War. So the Baggers really are like the Southern Slave Masters. Fancy that.
Week Two of the Revolution has brought quite a different type of action. Instead of brick throwing and racist language, we see not one but THREE different Bagger-affiliated militia groups busted. One of which openly stated they were going to assassinate Obama. And the best thing yet: Obama made some recess appointments! ha!
So, despite my innate cynicism, I'm going to ride this wave of hope and believe that maybe, just maybe these people really are just the wacko fringe. Sure, they may get all the media coverage, but so what. It feels good to feel hopeful for once.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Monday, March 29, 2010
Serving your Country: Expanded Edition
What I'm about to say is heresy to some, so please just bear with me till I get to the point. No disrespect to the "brave men and women in uniform" who put their lives on the line for our country -- because they do indeed do that and they deserve our respect for it -- but I am pretty darn tired of that being the only way one can "serve one's country." Signing up to risk one's life might be the ultimate way, but the only way?
What about all those jobs we used to call "public servants"? I know that we are supposed to think the Government is evil incarnate and that working for it makes you part of the problem -- but let's leave that to the Tea Baggers for a moment. Let's consider the fact that government employees are the people who get the work of the government done. Things like repairing the roads you drive your big fat SUV on, or cleaning up that shitter you use at your favorite National Park. And before you go and tell me that government workers have a pretty good deal -- good benefits, paid leave, and virtually no way to be fired -- let me ask: What exactly is the proper pay rate for cleaning up an outhouse full of other people's poo?
And speaking of stinky jobs, how about your trashman? What do you think that job is worth? What would happen if you didn't have someone willing to serve his country by hauling your molding waste away from your tidy little suburban neighborhood? Yes, I realize that corporate giant Waste Management may have taken over this service in your neighborhood, but just humor me and keep this one in the public servant basket for now.
And the greatest public servants of all: teachers. They don't even make a living wage, much less get the respect their profession deserves. Let's face it: no one goes into teaching for the money. Then on top of that, they get their hands tied with crap like No Child Left Behind, which basically denies them any freedom to actually teach anything meaningful.
I'll never forget the day this kind of thing crystallized for me. I was reading Why we hate France but Love the French, which actually isn't as good as it sounds. But it did discuss the French attitude toward public service: it's an honor. That's right, people think it's the bee's knees to be a government employee, to serve one's country by spending a third of your life drowning in bureaucracy. But it was a real light-bulb moment for me, a whole new perspective.
A perspective I think we would be well served by. Instead of only focusing on the military, why not include all our public servants when we talk about "serving the country"? Why not speak of such jobs with honor and respect? It's pretty insulting to act like there's One and Only One way to serve your country. So, if you dedicate your life to teaching children, let's say you do this in an impoverished inner-city neighborhood.....that's not serving your country? How about those friendly public librarians, who can always help you find the book (ie, knowledge, ie power) you're looking for? And again, the poor schlub whose job it is to clean up the poo?
These people (and many many more) serve the country equally well, in equally valid ways. To say so does not denigrate the service of our military. It elevates those who serve in all the ways we take for granted.
What about all those jobs we used to call "public servants"? I know that we are supposed to think the Government is evil incarnate and that working for it makes you part of the problem -- but let's leave that to the Tea Baggers for a moment. Let's consider the fact that government employees are the people who get the work of the government done. Things like repairing the roads you drive your big fat SUV on, or cleaning up that shitter you use at your favorite National Park. And before you go and tell me that government workers have a pretty good deal -- good benefits, paid leave, and virtually no way to be fired -- let me ask: What exactly is the proper pay rate for cleaning up an outhouse full of other people's poo?
And speaking of stinky jobs, how about your trashman? What do you think that job is worth? What would happen if you didn't have someone willing to serve his country by hauling your molding waste away from your tidy little suburban neighborhood? Yes, I realize that corporate giant Waste Management may have taken over this service in your neighborhood, but just humor me and keep this one in the public servant basket for now.
And the greatest public servants of all: teachers. They don't even make a living wage, much less get the respect their profession deserves. Let's face it: no one goes into teaching for the money. Then on top of that, they get their hands tied with crap like No Child Left Behind, which basically denies them any freedom to actually teach anything meaningful.
I'll never forget the day this kind of thing crystallized for me. I was reading Why we hate France but Love the French, which actually isn't as good as it sounds. But it did discuss the French attitude toward public service: it's an honor. That's right, people think it's the bee's knees to be a government employee, to serve one's country by spending a third of your life drowning in bureaucracy. But it was a real light-bulb moment for me, a whole new perspective.
A perspective I think we would be well served by. Instead of only focusing on the military, why not include all our public servants when we talk about "serving the country"? Why not speak of such jobs with honor and respect? It's pretty insulting to act like there's One and Only One way to serve your country. So, if you dedicate your life to teaching children, let's say you do this in an impoverished inner-city neighborhood.....that's not serving your country? How about those friendly public librarians, who can always help you find the book (ie, knowledge, ie power) you're looking for? And again, the poor schlub whose job it is to clean up the poo?
These people (and many many more) serve the country equally well, in equally valid ways. To say so does not denigrate the service of our military. It elevates those who serve in all the ways we take for granted.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Parenting Left
Someone recently asked me if I would let my children read The Rude Pundit. Well no, of course not, although they do know all the colorful words he uses. But I do let them listen to him on the radio, where the FCC requires that certain words be omitted.
So, how does one effectively raise children to be liberal thinkers in today's tea bagger climate? Thankfully, I'm not worried what the neighbors think, so it's pretty easy for me. It all boils down to exposure. Cuz if you don't expose them to it, they sure ain't gonna get it anywhere else. And next thing you know, they'll be joining the New Neocons of America group at school.
Step 1: progressive radio is just about the only radio in our house. It's on every morning, while we get ready for school and work. My kids are inundated with Stephanie Miller (and Rude every Monday!). They get a dose of Thom Hartmann every evening during the transition time between school and dinner. And as any parent will tell you, they're listening -- even if they don't show it. My 8 yr old love the moniker Caribou Barbie so much, I had to have a chat with her about using it in front of her Republican friends.
Step 2: Progressive shows are the only grown-up programming we watch (well, except for Lost). My kids have known Jon Stewart since day 1. And just now, the 8 yr old begged to watch Fareed Zakaria! Yeah, they still like Wizards of Waverly Place too, but at least they are balanced!
Step 3: When they hear Daddy and Mommy talking about some political issue and ask questions, I answer them honestly. "Why are you and daddy so angry?" "Because our government doesn't care about helping the people; they only care about making money for their friends." (this was in the W years). Then it's not only a lesson about the government, but also about the values of helping people and caring about others, the planet, etc.
In fact, one night, the 8 yr old (when she was 6) was acting all shy about asking me what a "bad word" meant. She was afraid to say the word. I said, how do you know it's bad then? She said, because you and daddy are angry when you use it. The word? Hypocrite. A Mama couldn't be prouder.
Step 4: Get them involved in democracy. I took them to the caucus; took them to an Obama house party (even though I'm a Kucinich gal). Make sure they know how important it is to vote, what a treasure it is.
We held a Guy Fawkes party (google it) in 2008 -- it was right before the election, after all, so it was perfect. My oldest loved it -- was a perfect little hostess handing out pocket Constitutions and helping people make their effigies for burning.
Step 5: Surround them with books. Lots of them. Let them know that knowledge is power. Don't let them be like Texas! (ooh, and don't forget to take them to Banned Book Week at your local public library!)
I could go on and on. But you get the idea. Personally, I don't really find it too challenging. The schools are too pantywaisted to teach anything of substance, so there's little to contradict my teachings. Of course, there was that time the kindergarten teacher asked if I'd told my kid she didn't have to say the Pledge of Allegiance if she didn't want to....(she did have to stand respectfully for it, however).
Parenting Left and speaking out in this time of Tea Bagging Darkness (it's a dark brew indeed) are the paths I've chosen to keep the Left alive, to keep the notions of social justice, compassion, and truth going. And I don't need corporate media to do it. All I need is some Thom Hartmann, a good bookstore, and yes, Rude Pundit.
So, how does one effectively raise children to be liberal thinkers in today's tea bagger climate? Thankfully, I'm not worried what the neighbors think, so it's pretty easy for me. It all boils down to exposure. Cuz if you don't expose them to it, they sure ain't gonna get it anywhere else. And next thing you know, they'll be joining the New Neocons of America group at school.
Step 1: progressive radio is just about the only radio in our house. It's on every morning, while we get ready for school and work. My kids are inundated with Stephanie Miller (and Rude every Monday!). They get a dose of Thom Hartmann every evening during the transition time between school and dinner. And as any parent will tell you, they're listening -- even if they don't show it. My 8 yr old love the moniker Caribou Barbie so much, I had to have a chat with her about using it in front of her Republican friends.
Step 2: Progressive shows are the only grown-up programming we watch (well, except for Lost). My kids have known Jon Stewart since day 1. And just now, the 8 yr old begged to watch Fareed Zakaria! Yeah, they still like Wizards of Waverly Place too, but at least they are balanced!
Step 3: When they hear Daddy and Mommy talking about some political issue and ask questions, I answer them honestly. "Why are you and daddy so angry?" "Because our government doesn't care about helping the people; they only care about making money for their friends." (this was in the W years). Then it's not only a lesson about the government, but also about the values of helping people and caring about others, the planet, etc.
In fact, one night, the 8 yr old (when she was 6) was acting all shy about asking me what a "bad word" meant. She was afraid to say the word. I said, how do you know it's bad then? She said, because you and daddy are angry when you use it. The word? Hypocrite. A Mama couldn't be prouder.
Step 4: Get them involved in democracy. I took them to the caucus; took them to an Obama house party (even though I'm a Kucinich gal). Make sure they know how important it is to vote, what a treasure it is.
We held a Guy Fawkes party (google it) in 2008 -- it was right before the election, after all, so it was perfect. My oldest loved it -- was a perfect little hostess handing out pocket Constitutions and helping people make their effigies for burning.
Step 5: Surround them with books. Lots of them. Let them know that knowledge is power. Don't let them be like Texas! (ooh, and don't forget to take them to Banned Book Week at your local public library!)
I could go on and on. But you get the idea. Personally, I don't really find it too challenging. The schools are too pantywaisted to teach anything of substance, so there's little to contradict my teachings. Of course, there was that time the kindergarten teacher asked if I'd told my kid she didn't have to say the Pledge of Allegiance if she didn't want to....(she did have to stand respectfully for it, however).
Parenting Left and speaking out in this time of Tea Bagging Darkness (it's a dark brew indeed) are the paths I've chosen to keep the Left alive, to keep the notions of social justice, compassion, and truth going. And I don't need corporate media to do it. All I need is some Thom Hartmann, a good bookstore, and yes, Rude Pundit.
Integrity in the time of Tea Baggers
Yesterday someone told me I had damaged my credibility with this blog. It came out of the blue, and several questions raced through my mind. Was it really compromised? What made him say that? Who the hell did he think he was? Hadn't he read any of my previous blogs? And finally, why do I care?
The truth is, I don't care what this guy thinks. After all, he's just a "friend" on a social network (one who sought me out, I might add). And truly, if he was surprised by anything on this blog, then he wasn't reading my old blog very closely. True, that blog was much more polite, as political ranting wasn't really appropriate for that network, but still. I am pretty WYSIWYG. (Too young to know what that means? Ask your parents).
It did start me thinking, though, because my credibility (ie, integrity) is pretty important to me. After all, if I don't have that, I don't have anything. No matter what, if I have honor and ethics and am true to those ideals, then I'll be fine in the end.
And that's part of the problem with the whole Tea Bagger movement. They have no honor. Their leaders -- talking heads like Rush, O'Lie-lly, and Beck bandy such outrageous ideas about, it's hard to even call them liars. I think maybe Karl Rove is their leader - he's the Emperor and Cheney is his Sith lord. These people knowingly throw blatant falsehoods out there, and the populace -- too ignorant, tired, or lazy to know better -- laps it up with glee. Then you get these Baggers who take it to the furthest extreme.
Let's make a quick checklist, shall we? Things that damage your credibility:
I have always held true to my belief in facts, dialogue, and using a good round of devil's advocate to develop my opinions. I enjoy discussing issues with people on the other side of the fence, because we always end up giving each other food for thought. Ultimately we both grow and become better people for it.
"Hi, I'm GeekChick, and I have a problem. I am exceedingly intolerant of people who are closed-minded, bigoted, and intolerant of differing ideas." Is there a program for that?
Well, as often happens, I lost the bead of where I was going when I started this thought. In any case, I don't think my credibility is even slightly tarnished. I have never pretended to be centrist. Or even polite, for that matter. I agreed to a certain modicum of politeness and "neutrality" (not truly so) on this other site, but it was always quite clear which side of the fence I was on. And furthermore, I have always welcomed opposing viewpoints, as long as they are thought out and based on facts. No mudslinging, no Rovian talking points.
I know who I am and that I have integrity. As I've taught my children, the worst thing you can be in this world is a hypocrite. And if you are surprised to learn that I am a socialist lefty, then you haven't been listening all along. If you are bothered by that, then go back to Fox and Friends. I'm sure they'll still take you.
The truth is, I don't care what this guy thinks. After all, he's just a "friend" on a social network (one who sought me out, I might add). And truly, if he was surprised by anything on this blog, then he wasn't reading my old blog very closely. True, that blog was much more polite, as political ranting wasn't really appropriate for that network, but still. I am pretty WYSIWYG. (Too young to know what that means? Ask your parents).
It did start me thinking, though, because my credibility (ie, integrity) is pretty important to me. After all, if I don't have that, I don't have anything. No matter what, if I have honor and ethics and am true to those ideals, then I'll be fine in the end.
And that's part of the problem with the whole Tea Bagger movement. They have no honor. Their leaders -- talking heads like Rush, O'Lie-lly, and Beck bandy such outrageous ideas about, it's hard to even call them liars. I think maybe Karl Rove is their leader - he's the Emperor and Cheney is his Sith lord. These people knowingly throw blatant falsehoods out there, and the populace -- too ignorant, tired, or lazy to know better -- laps it up with glee. Then you get these Baggers who take it to the furthest extreme.
Let's make a quick checklist, shall we? Things that damage your credibility:
- Spitting on Congressmen
- Using racial slurs
- Throwing bricks through windows
- Cutting gas lines to people's houses
- Using terms like fascism and socialist improperly
- Thinking Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin have two functioning neurons between them both
I have always held true to my belief in facts, dialogue, and using a good round of devil's advocate to develop my opinions. I enjoy discussing issues with people on the other side of the fence, because we always end up giving each other food for thought. Ultimately we both grow and become better people for it.
"Hi, I'm GeekChick, and I have a problem. I am exceedingly intolerant of people who are closed-minded, bigoted, and intolerant of differing ideas." Is there a program for that?
Well, as often happens, I lost the bead of where I was going when I started this thought. In any case, I don't think my credibility is even slightly tarnished. I have never pretended to be centrist. Or even polite, for that matter. I agreed to a certain modicum of politeness and "neutrality" (not truly so) on this other site, but it was always quite clear which side of the fence I was on. And furthermore, I have always welcomed opposing viewpoints, as long as they are thought out and based on facts. No mudslinging, no Rovian talking points.
I know who I am and that I have integrity. As I've taught my children, the worst thing you can be in this world is a hypocrite. And if you are surprised to learn that I am a socialist lefty, then you haven't been listening all along. If you are bothered by that, then go back to Fox and Friends. I'm sure they'll still take you.
Uncivil Disobedience
Last night I posted a pretty angry article on how the Baggers think they are having some sort of little revolution. Thankfully today I feel a little more myself, and as such I would like to address the same topic with a little more aplomb.
There is a HUGE difference between what the Baggers are doing and anything the Left has done in the past. (WTO and similar dumbheads excepted -- we don't claim them as our own). Civil disobedience this is not.
Civil disobedience has been a cornerstone of the Left for decades. Sit ins, chaining oneself to a tree, going limp when being arrested for these actions......The key is that all these actions, while disruptive, are inherently nonviolent. In fact, participants in and advocates of civil disobedience routinely disavow any acts of violence. Personal assault (spitting), racially based hatred (n-word), and violence (brick throwing) are not tolerated, much less promoted.
I'm not sure what to call what the Baggers are doing. Rioting, maybe? Whatever label you give it, it's wrong. It's criminal! And so is the act of encouraging these things -- inciting someone to commit violence or crime is itself a crime. And it's bad enough that we have Beck et al encouraging it -- but we actually have elected GOP officials egging them on too!
I feel like I've followed Alice right down the rabbit hole. Where is this strange place I've landed? What kind of rules govern this place where such acts are considered acceptable?
These people are just getting off, feeling powerful or self-satisfied in their stupid acts. Just like the idiots who burned police cars in Berkeley during the Gulf War protests way back in Bush I's rule. We legitimate protesters publicly denounced them and their violence. Where are the reasonable conservatives denouncing the Baggers?
This whole thing is just so unbelievable....I really do feel like I smoked with the Caterpillar or ate some of his magic mushroom. This is no way to have a revolution (not that there's really anything to revolt against, frankly. See yesterday's post). This is just stupid people doing stupid things that make them feel big. Kind of like a guy with a small penis driving a monster truck.
Thoreau, Gandhi, and other proponents of civil disobedience are rolling in their graves. They are appalled. But then, I suppose the Baggers haven't really read any of these people's works; after all, that would put them in lefty-elite territory.
Disobedient, yes. Civilized, no.
There is a HUGE difference between what the Baggers are doing and anything the Left has done in the past. (WTO and similar dumbheads excepted -- we don't claim them as our own). Civil disobedience this is not.
Civil disobedience has been a cornerstone of the Left for decades. Sit ins, chaining oneself to a tree, going limp when being arrested for these actions......The key is that all these actions, while disruptive, are inherently nonviolent. In fact, participants in and advocates of civil disobedience routinely disavow any acts of violence. Personal assault (spitting), racially based hatred (n-word), and violence (brick throwing) are not tolerated, much less promoted.
I'm not sure what to call what the Baggers are doing. Rioting, maybe? Whatever label you give it, it's wrong. It's criminal! And so is the act of encouraging these things -- inciting someone to commit violence or crime is itself a crime. And it's bad enough that we have Beck et al encouraging it -- but we actually have elected GOP officials egging them on too!
I feel like I've followed Alice right down the rabbit hole. Where is this strange place I've landed? What kind of rules govern this place where such acts are considered acceptable?
These people are just getting off, feeling powerful or self-satisfied in their stupid acts. Just like the idiots who burned police cars in Berkeley during the Gulf War protests way back in Bush I's rule. We legitimate protesters publicly denounced them and their violence. Where are the reasonable conservatives denouncing the Baggers?
This whole thing is just so unbelievable....I really do feel like I smoked with the Caterpillar or ate some of his magic mushroom. This is no way to have a revolution (not that there's really anything to revolt against, frankly. See yesterday's post). This is just stupid people doing stupid things that make them feel big. Kind of like a guy with a small penis driving a monster truck.
Thoreau, Gandhi, and other proponents of civil disobedience are rolling in their graves. They are appalled. But then, I suppose the Baggers haven't really read any of these people's works; after all, that would put them in lefty-elite territory.
Disobedient, yes. Civilized, no.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Boo Frickin Hoo
Free thinking Americans, also known as liberals, suffered so much during the W years. We were accused of being in league with terrorists for voicing our dissent. We watched words like patriot get co-opted and twisted into horrible things. We watched our country torn apart and abused by corporate interests and the Republican lackies they put in office.
And then one day, to paraphrase Hillary, the clouds parted and the heavenly choir sang. (I prefer using rainbows and butterfly imagery myself, but....) And lo! The Democrats were in power! Not that that means very much, given how they grabbed their ankles during the W years, but still. It was something.
And now that we've had our first significant victory (if you can call this lame-ass bill that), the Tea Baggers can't handle it. They never thought it could really happen! They were so smug, so self-assured and self-righteous, it never occurred to them that they might lose. And now that the shoe is on the other foot, what do they do? To they man-up and take it like we did? I guess the first time is the hardest, but.......
Spitting on Congressmen? Throwing bricks through windows? Fomenting violence and crime? Seriously?
Now don't any of you dare try and tell me that there were lefties doing the same thing. Because as a movement, there weren't. There are always fringe people exhibiting their stupidity (WTO protests, anyone?), but that is not the same as a 'legitimized' movement. Which the Baggers are.
So now we have political "leaders," "news" anchors, and other official types inciting all this. Egging them on. Encouraging these outrageous acts. Hey Baggers, I've got news for you: spitting on someone is assault, which is a CRIME. Throwing a brick through a window is assault, vandalism, and damage to property -- all CRIMES.
Oh I'm sure the Baggers are all pleased as punch with themselves, thinking they are an actual revolution. Please. If they think this bill is the brink of fascism, communism, or armageddon, then what on earth would they do if any of those really came to pass? Soil themselves would be first on the list, I imagine.
But that's just it: they think they are really doing something radical and meaningful. But they aren't. This ain't Revolutionary France, or the Czech Republic, or the Civil War. Talk about delusions of grandeur.
This is a mediocre, centrist bill that was so watered down that neither side liked it very much and it barely passed. The Right can't handle this? This bill is so useless, I'm sick of hearing about how big a f***ing deal it is already. What on earth would the Right do if we actually managed something like single payer? Or repeal Don't Ask/Don't Tell, or allow Gay Marriage, or (gasp!) mandate evolution be taught in science class?
I'm sorry. I know I'm ranting. I know I'm not as eloquent as I may usually be. But I'm mad as hell, and I'm not taking it anymore. I've been trying all this time to have reasonable discussions with people, to show them the light. And now we're down to the crazy mother f***ers who, well, just won't ever see any light. Because they don't want to. They are too busy basking in the tanning bed that Glenn and Rush have set up for them. They'd better watch out, or they'll end up looking like Boehner: fake and played out.
I am appalled that these people, and the media and elected officials who started all this, think this behavior is ok. I am embarrassed (once again) on behalf of America. Sickened by association. Well I've had enough.
Won't you join me?
And then one day, to paraphrase Hillary, the clouds parted and the heavenly choir sang. (I prefer using rainbows and butterfly imagery myself, but....) And lo! The Democrats were in power! Not that that means very much, given how they grabbed their ankles during the W years, but still. It was something.
And now that we've had our first significant victory (if you can call this lame-ass bill that), the Tea Baggers can't handle it. They never thought it could really happen! They were so smug, so self-assured and self-righteous, it never occurred to them that they might lose. And now that the shoe is on the other foot, what do they do? To they man-up and take it like we did? I guess the first time is the hardest, but.......
Spitting on Congressmen? Throwing bricks through windows? Fomenting violence and crime? Seriously?
Now don't any of you dare try and tell me that there were lefties doing the same thing. Because as a movement, there weren't. There are always fringe people exhibiting their stupidity (WTO protests, anyone?), but that is not the same as a 'legitimized' movement. Which the Baggers are.
So now we have political "leaders," "news" anchors, and other official types inciting all this. Egging them on. Encouraging these outrageous acts. Hey Baggers, I've got news for you: spitting on someone is assault, which is a CRIME. Throwing a brick through a window is assault, vandalism, and damage to property -- all CRIMES.
Oh I'm sure the Baggers are all pleased as punch with themselves, thinking they are an actual revolution. Please. If they think this bill is the brink of fascism, communism, or armageddon, then what on earth would they do if any of those really came to pass? Soil themselves would be first on the list, I imagine.
But that's just it: they think they are really doing something radical and meaningful. But they aren't. This ain't Revolutionary France, or the Czech Republic, or the Civil War. Talk about delusions of grandeur.
This is a mediocre, centrist bill that was so watered down that neither side liked it very much and it barely passed. The Right can't handle this? This bill is so useless, I'm sick of hearing about how big a f***ing deal it is already. What on earth would the Right do if we actually managed something like single payer? Or repeal Don't Ask/Don't Tell, or allow Gay Marriage, or (gasp!) mandate evolution be taught in science class?
I'm sorry. I know I'm ranting. I know I'm not as eloquent as I may usually be. But I'm mad as hell, and I'm not taking it anymore. I've been trying all this time to have reasonable discussions with people, to show them the light. And now we're down to the crazy mother f***ers who, well, just won't ever see any light. Because they don't want to. They are too busy basking in the tanning bed that Glenn and Rush have set up for them. They'd better watch out, or they'll end up looking like Boehner: fake and played out.
I am appalled that these people, and the media and elected officials who started all this, think this behavior is ok. I am embarrassed (once again) on behalf of America. Sickened by association. Well I've had enough.
Won't you join me?
Monday, March 22, 2010
Hope Springs Eternal
Someone once asked me why I was so pessimistic. I corrected her and noted that I am cynical, which is not the same. As I like to say, cynicism is a protective cloak used by optimists to keep their hopes from getting (too) dashed.
And damn if that didn't just get proven. Silly me, I went and posted something to some Tea Partier friend's Facebook page.....He was bitching about 'how will we pay for health care' -- and I gave my usual response about how we are already paying, etc. I wasn't angry -- I try to be factual when I engage the Enemy. You know, expecting that rational discussion could be had.
What was I thinking?
Why, time and again, do I think one can actually have some rational discussion with these people? They were nutjobs, every last one of them (my friend wisely refrained from further comment.....). Not one of them even responded to the points I made or questions I raised. Just straight up barf-back of Faux News talking points. I may as well have been watching Glenn Beck for all the dialogue going on.
I should've known better, you might be saying right about now. Yes, I should have. But for every 100 or so nutbags I suffer, I find one really cool person with whom I can actually discuss and debate. I guess I only encountered 99 today......
But it just goes to show: I really am an optimist. Only an optimist could continue to engage such dopeheads in such fruitless conversations that inevitably contain personal attacks. Now, where did I put that cloak of cynicism...it's around here somewhere........
And damn if that didn't just get proven. Silly me, I went and posted something to some Tea Partier friend's Facebook page.....He was bitching about 'how will we pay for health care' -- and I gave my usual response about how we are already paying, etc. I wasn't angry -- I try to be factual when I engage the Enemy. You know, expecting that rational discussion could be had.
What was I thinking?
Why, time and again, do I think one can actually have some rational discussion with these people? They were nutjobs, every last one of them (my friend wisely refrained from further comment.....). Not one of them even responded to the points I made or questions I raised. Just straight up barf-back of Faux News talking points. I may as well have been watching Glenn Beck for all the dialogue going on.
I should've known better, you might be saying right about now. Yes, I should have. But for every 100 or so nutbags I suffer, I find one really cool person with whom I can actually discuss and debate. I guess I only encountered 99 today......
But it just goes to show: I really am an optimist. Only an optimist could continue to engage such dopeheads in such fruitless conversations that inevitably contain personal attacks. Now, where did I put that cloak of cynicism...it's around here somewhere........
Butt-Shaper Sneakers: Do They Really Work?
In short: yes.
Why, on a blog like this, would I take a moment to discuss sneakers? Because it was reading someone's blog that helped me decide whether or not to buy them myself -- so I'm gonna pay it forward.
I shelled out $100 to get some Skecher's Shape Ups. You know, the Frankensneakers that supposedly tone your legs and butt while you walk. I was skeptical, but as I said I read a very good blog with not only the writer's experience but also that of all her commenters. So I decided I'd give them a try.
The first time I put them on, it was, in the words of a coworker, like "clouds for my feet." The sole is so cushy and shock-aborbent. The first time I walked in them, it was a leisurely stroll for sure -- but damn if I didn't feel it immediately. I could tell they were working my muscles differently.
To be fair, I have not done a full-on, power-walk test of these shoes. So I can't say how quickly one might see tangible results. But here's what I have done: this past weekend, I wore them for my usual tourista-type walking -- primarily museum going. After a single day of simple walking around two museums, my legs were exhausted. And no, it wasn't the "I'm out of shape" exhaustion. I felt like I'd had a massive date with the elliptical, or maybe climbed a mountain. I did it again the next day, though for a slightly shorter day. Today I can still feel the burn.
Butt-shaping aside, they are great for reducing the impact to your knees and other joints. The cloud-like cushioning is fabulous. They really were comfortable for walking all day. While I personally feel the muscle-working in my knees most (in the tendons in back), I think that is a factor of my particular training needs. If you are looking for impact-reduction, these are a great option.
The shoes are hot, though -- my feet were desperate for air after the long day. I didn't wear socks either -- a move I don't recommend. They were a little abrasive inside (though that could be cuz they are still new) and socks probably would've helped with the hot-foot action. And of course the biggest issue is that you have to get over the Frankenstein look. I have the black-and-white sneakers called "Strength" -- they were the only style I could stomach. But that's a matter of personal taste. They actually make them in so many varieties and styles -- not just sneakers.
So, if you've been considering these, go for it. They are worth the money. If you can find an outlet, you can save a few dinars (though not many -- I only saved $10). Many other brands are making their own varieties -- I can't speak to how they compare to Skechers. Even if you only wear them while walking the dogs or on your own museum adventures, you'll appreciate their comfort and effortless exercise!
Why, on a blog like this, would I take a moment to discuss sneakers? Because it was reading someone's blog that helped me decide whether or not to buy them myself -- so I'm gonna pay it forward.
I shelled out $100 to get some Skecher's Shape Ups. You know, the Frankensneakers that supposedly tone your legs and butt while you walk. I was skeptical, but as I said I read a very good blog with not only the writer's experience but also that of all her commenters. So I decided I'd give them a try.
The first time I put them on, it was, in the words of a coworker, like "clouds for my feet." The sole is so cushy and shock-aborbent. The first time I walked in them, it was a leisurely stroll for sure -- but damn if I didn't feel it immediately. I could tell they were working my muscles differently.
To be fair, I have not done a full-on, power-walk test of these shoes. So I can't say how quickly one might see tangible results. But here's what I have done: this past weekend, I wore them for my usual tourista-type walking -- primarily museum going. After a single day of simple walking around two museums, my legs were exhausted. And no, it wasn't the "I'm out of shape" exhaustion. I felt like I'd had a massive date with the elliptical, or maybe climbed a mountain. I did it again the next day, though for a slightly shorter day. Today I can still feel the burn.
Butt-shaping aside, they are great for reducing the impact to your knees and other joints. The cloud-like cushioning is fabulous. They really were comfortable for walking all day. While I personally feel the muscle-working in my knees most (in the tendons in back), I think that is a factor of my particular training needs. If you are looking for impact-reduction, these are a great option.
The shoes are hot, though -- my feet were desperate for air after the long day. I didn't wear socks either -- a move I don't recommend. They were a little abrasive inside (though that could be cuz they are still new) and socks probably would've helped with the hot-foot action. And of course the biggest issue is that you have to get over the Frankenstein look. I have the black-and-white sneakers called "Strength" -- they were the only style I could stomach. But that's a matter of personal taste. They actually make them in so many varieties and styles -- not just sneakers.
So, if you've been considering these, go for it. They are worth the money. If you can find an outlet, you can save a few dinars (though not many -- I only saved $10). Many other brands are making their own varieties -- I can't speak to how they compare to Skechers. Even if you only wear them while walking the dogs or on your own museum adventures, you'll appreciate their comfort and effortless exercise!
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Oppie, Frank, and Me
What a strange circle of coincidence I just had. Just last week I wrote a piece for an online book group about J. Robert Oppenheimer and the Bhagavad Gita. And then just this weekend I found myself in the Exploratorium -- that most wonderful (and first) of hands-on science museums, which was created by Robert's brother Frank. Reflecting on this coincidence, I realize how much these two brothers have influenced my life.
I first visited the Exploratorium as a teenager -- I was maybe 14 or so. Already a died-in-the-wool geekchick, I loved it. I was all about bringing science to the people (that was the Carl Sagan influence, but that's another article), and this place just blew me away. I already understood many of the concepts, but I loved the way they made them so accessible. It was a formative moment in my life. Without doubt, knowing how accessible science could be helped me in my future career as a park ranger and science educator.
That being the 1980's, of course I was also concerned with the idea of nuclear holocaust. Reading about nuclear winter (again, thanks to Carl) got me interested in the history of the bomb itself. Enter J. Robert, or Oppie. From the moment I first saw a photo of his penetrating, haunting gaze, I felt strangely compelled. I watched documentaries, I read books, I ate up whatever I could about the Manhattan Project. And what really captured me was not the science part; it was the tragedy of Oppie himself. That he was conflicted even as he participated in the Project, and that he was further tormented and persecuted afterward. That he was an avid reader of the Gita also caught me -- and of course I promptly read it.
It's difficult to put into words exactly how this affected me and the course of my life, but it did. Maybe it just gave me a deeper, non-Western philosophical bent. One that has only grown through time; today I most closely identify with Hinduism over other religions. This worldview influences the way I think about everything. I might have found this path anyhow, but I know Oppie cemented it.
In my readings about Oppie and the Manhattan Project, I learned that Frank Oppenheimer was the founder of my beloved Exploratorium. What a wonderful bit of synergy! The Exploratorium connected me to Frank which connected me to Oppie. To feel such a strange, if indirect, connection was a tad profound. (This was before Six Degrees of Separation was a common thing).
Flash forward about 20 years. I find myself reading the Mahabharata, of with the Bhagavad Gita is a part. So I write a discussion topic about it and Oppie. In a matter of days, I am in the Exploratorium, watching my own children eat it up as Frank envisioned. And finally, in the giftshop, I found a biography of the in-the-shadows Oppenheimer brother. I can't wait to read it (though I still have a lot of Maha to go.....).
So what's the point of this article? I don't know. Just an homage to the Oppenheimer brothers, I guess. They and Carl form my Trinity of Science Gurus.
If you would like to learn more, I highly recommend the following:
"The Day after Trinity," a documentary film
"The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Richard Rhodes
"American Prometheus" by Kai Bird
"Something Incredibly Wonderful Happens" by KC Cole (this is the one I just bought, but it looks like it'll be good)
I first visited the Exploratorium as a teenager -- I was maybe 14 or so. Already a died-in-the-wool geekchick, I loved it. I was all about bringing science to the people (that was the Carl Sagan influence, but that's another article), and this place just blew me away. I already understood many of the concepts, but I loved the way they made them so accessible. It was a formative moment in my life. Without doubt, knowing how accessible science could be helped me in my future career as a park ranger and science educator.
That being the 1980's, of course I was also concerned with the idea of nuclear holocaust. Reading about nuclear winter (again, thanks to Carl) got me interested in the history of the bomb itself. Enter J. Robert, or Oppie. From the moment I first saw a photo of his penetrating, haunting gaze, I felt strangely compelled. I watched documentaries, I read books, I ate up whatever I could about the Manhattan Project. And what really captured me was not the science part; it was the tragedy of Oppie himself. That he was conflicted even as he participated in the Project, and that he was further tormented and persecuted afterward. That he was an avid reader of the Gita also caught me -- and of course I promptly read it.
It's difficult to put into words exactly how this affected me and the course of my life, but it did. Maybe it just gave me a deeper, non-Western philosophical bent. One that has only grown through time; today I most closely identify with Hinduism over other religions. This worldview influences the way I think about everything. I might have found this path anyhow, but I know Oppie cemented it.
In my readings about Oppie and the Manhattan Project, I learned that Frank Oppenheimer was the founder of my beloved Exploratorium. What a wonderful bit of synergy! The Exploratorium connected me to Frank which connected me to Oppie. To feel such a strange, if indirect, connection was a tad profound. (This was before Six Degrees of Separation was a common thing).
Flash forward about 20 years. I find myself reading the Mahabharata, of with the Bhagavad Gita is a part. So I write a discussion topic about it and Oppie. In a matter of days, I am in the Exploratorium, watching my own children eat it up as Frank envisioned. And finally, in the giftshop, I found a biography of the in-the-shadows Oppenheimer brother. I can't wait to read it (though I still have a lot of Maha to go.....).
So what's the point of this article? I don't know. Just an homage to the Oppenheimer brothers, I guess. They and Carl form my Trinity of Science Gurus.
If you would like to learn more, I highly recommend the following:
"The Day after Trinity," a documentary film
"The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Richard Rhodes
"American Prometheus" by Kai Bird
"Something Incredibly Wonderful Happens" by KC Cole (this is the one I just bought, but it looks like it'll be good)
Thursday, March 18, 2010
I'm with Dennis
The right-wing media is having a field day over Dennis Kucinich's vote on health care. They shiver with ecstacy over his "flip flopping" on the issue. This drivel doesn't really deserve comment.
What I really want to talk about is why I'm still with Dennis. He was my #1 choice for President in 2008, and he's still one-half of my dream ticket (Sanders being the other). And his speech on why he chose to vote for the health care bill shows why.
Like Kucinich, I was a hardcore hold-out for single payer. For months I've been saying "Hell no!" to the current bill, because it doesn't do nearly enough. Big K and I fought the good fight against "something is better than nothing." But in the end, he realized how critical it was that he vote for this piece of crap that we have. Because at the end of the day, something is better than nothing.
This is not a flip flop. Kucinich believes in doing what's best for the American people. And what's best is single payer, but when it became clear that that was not an option on the table, he was faced with a difficult decision. He described his dilemma most eloquently in his press conference announcing his vote. He recognized that at this point, it was time to put aside the Good Fight (for a few moments) and at least get the protections of the current bill in place. And I have no doubt that he -- and Bernie Sanders and Alan Grayson -- will resume the Good Fight once the vote is over. (Bernie has made some great statements this past week on that -- Google it).
So, while I think the current bill is a piece of crap compared to what we COULD have (had the Dems had any balls enough to propose it in the first place), I'll get onboard because Dennis decided it was best. He's earned my trust that way. And it's just so obvious and boring that Faux and Friends are attacking him for it.
Oh, and the icing on the cake? Kucinich is giving back campaign contributions to people who expected him to vote for single payer health care! He feels he must do this, because he did not do what they "paid" him to do. How many elected officials would do that?
Whichever radio host I was listening to at the time said it best: Kucinich is a man of honor. How rare that is today, in any field -- but certainly so in politics. We need more people with that kind of integrity. Think how great our country would be if we did! And that's why I like Ron Paul -- he and I are completely opposite in ideology, but he has integrity and honor. It's just those pesky Tea Baggers that are the problem.
Kucinich has a bright future, if we can get more of the populace to see it. Imagine this: a Sanders/Kucinich ticket (cuz Bernie's older and so should go first) for 8 years....then a Kucinich and....I don't know...Grayson?.....for another 8. Now I'm shivering with ecstasy.
So encourage any conservative types you know to look past the bullshit of Faux "News" and look at the man. Regardless of your politics, Kucinich is a man of honor. And as such, we all have something to learn from him, and we would all be served by keeping him in our government.
What I really want to talk about is why I'm still with Dennis. He was my #1 choice for President in 2008, and he's still one-half of my dream ticket (Sanders being the other). And his speech on why he chose to vote for the health care bill shows why.
Like Kucinich, I was a hardcore hold-out for single payer. For months I've been saying "Hell no!" to the current bill, because it doesn't do nearly enough. Big K and I fought the good fight against "something is better than nothing." But in the end, he realized how critical it was that he vote for this piece of crap that we have. Because at the end of the day, something is better than nothing.
This is not a flip flop. Kucinich believes in doing what's best for the American people. And what's best is single payer, but when it became clear that that was not an option on the table, he was faced with a difficult decision. He described his dilemma most eloquently in his press conference announcing his vote. He recognized that at this point, it was time to put aside the Good Fight (for a few moments) and at least get the protections of the current bill in place. And I have no doubt that he -- and Bernie Sanders and Alan Grayson -- will resume the Good Fight once the vote is over. (Bernie has made some great statements this past week on that -- Google it).
So, while I think the current bill is a piece of crap compared to what we COULD have (had the Dems had any balls enough to propose it in the first place), I'll get onboard because Dennis decided it was best. He's earned my trust that way. And it's just so obvious and boring that Faux and Friends are attacking him for it.
Oh, and the icing on the cake? Kucinich is giving back campaign contributions to people who expected him to vote for single payer health care! He feels he must do this, because he did not do what they "paid" him to do. How many elected officials would do that?
Whichever radio host I was listening to at the time said it best: Kucinich is a man of honor. How rare that is today, in any field -- but certainly so in politics. We need more people with that kind of integrity. Think how great our country would be if we did! And that's why I like Ron Paul -- he and I are completely opposite in ideology, but he has integrity and honor. It's just those pesky Tea Baggers that are the problem.
Kucinich has a bright future, if we can get more of the populace to see it. Imagine this: a Sanders/Kucinich ticket (cuz Bernie's older and so should go first) for 8 years....then a Kucinich and....I don't know...Grayson?.....for another 8. Now I'm shivering with ecstasy.
So encourage any conservative types you know to look past the bullshit of Faux "News" and look at the man. Regardless of your politics, Kucinich is a man of honor. And as such, we all have something to learn from him, and we would all be served by keeping him in our government.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Would Somebody PLEASE Mess with Texas?
Wanting to secede from the country is one thing. Electing a boob like George W. for governor is one thing. Forgetting that there's a state in the Union over twice as big as yours is one thing.
Rewriting textbooks so they are filled with lies is another.
In case you've been living on the Moon this past week, or maybe in Texas, here's what's going on. The State's Education Board has revised its education standards. And honey, it makes Kansas' removal of evolution look like child's play.
Highlights include:
Now, if this stupidity was limited to Texas, I'd say who cares. Let them turn their kids into bigger idiots than they themselves are. But the situation is far more sinister.
Texas is the second largest buyer of school textbooks in the country. The publishers, eager to make a dollar in our marvelous, free-enterprise system, cater to the whims of the biggest buyers. So if Texas wants books full of lies, the rest of the country gets them too.
Sadly, this incredibly important story has received little coverage, even from the progressive media. While health care dominated (as it should), this story didn't even rank second. Ed Schultz spent all day talking about Tiger Woods. Randi Rhodes talked about Neal Horsley's admission that he f****d a mule. I heard Thom Hartmann mention this the other day, but it was a footnote in the main discussion.
Now don't get me wrong. I love all three of the aforementioned people. But it was a serious lack of judgement to let this story slip by. I'm especially looking at you, Ed.
I don't know what can be done now. I, for one, will make sure that my two kids know better. And I will keep screaming the truth here, there, and everywhere. I hope you do too. Because if we don't, we're lost. in two or three generations, the Truth will be gone forever.
Rewriting textbooks so they are filled with lies is another.
In case you've been living on the Moon this past week, or maybe in Texas, here's what's going on. The State's Education Board has revised its education standards. And honey, it makes Kansas' removal of evolution look like child's play.
Highlights include:
- Removal of Thomas Jefferson. That's right kids: one of our most prominent and critical Founding Fathers has been erased from the record. Why? Because he promoted separation of church and state.
- Propagating the "we are a Christian nation" myth. While Jefferson is out, the Fathers in general are in. But only because they had some loose rooting in Judeo-Christian foundings. The fact that they were Deists will be conveniently ignored.
- No Freedom of Religion. Students will not be taught that the Constitution prohibits the State promotion of one religion over another.
- False vindication of right-wing abusers like McCarthy. That's right. Texas kids will now learn how poor McCarthy was "blacklisted" by the liberal media, when in "fact" his communist witch-hunt was "necessary."
- Rewriting post-Reagan sociopolitical history. Students will learn all about the magnificent "conservative resurgence" that Dear Father Reagan ushered in. Thank god he helped us get rid of all those pesky, liberal thinking hippies of the 70's. According to the new version, liberal thought is virtually nonexistent.
Now, if this stupidity was limited to Texas, I'd say who cares. Let them turn their kids into bigger idiots than they themselves are. But the situation is far more sinister.
Texas is the second largest buyer of school textbooks in the country. The publishers, eager to make a dollar in our marvelous, free-enterprise system, cater to the whims of the biggest buyers. So if Texas wants books full of lies, the rest of the country gets them too.
Sadly, this incredibly important story has received little coverage, even from the progressive media. While health care dominated (as it should), this story didn't even rank second. Ed Schultz spent all day talking about Tiger Woods. Randi Rhodes talked about Neal Horsley's admission that he f****d a mule. I heard Thom Hartmann mention this the other day, but it was a footnote in the main discussion.
Now don't get me wrong. I love all three of the aforementioned people. But it was a serious lack of judgement to let this story slip by. I'm especially looking at you, Ed.
I don't know what can be done now. I, for one, will make sure that my two kids know better. And I will keep screaming the truth here, there, and everywhere. I hope you do too. Because if we don't, we're lost. in two or three generations, the Truth will be gone forever.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Getting 1,000,000 People to Join your Facebook Cause Doesn't Equal a Protest
One thing I have heard repeatedly during the last year -- as the economy tanked, as people lost their homes and jobs, as the Republicans' obstructionism watered down the health care debate -- was, "Where are all the protests? Why aren't the progressives taking to the streets?"
Yeah, where were we? Protesting has been the mainstay of the left since the 1960's. Heck, as recently as the 90's we were out there with our "No Blood for Oil" signs. But where are we now? Why, when so many critical issues are coming to a head, are we silent?
At first I thought that maybe we had just gotten too old as a generation -- that most of the GenXers (who carried on the mantle of the 60's hippies) had reached middle age and retired their protest signs. And that the Millenials were just too damned optimistic and naive to protest (and they are).
But that's not it. The real culprit is the rise of the internet and social networking. Back in the old days, the only way to commune with fellow lefties en masse was to attend a protest or gathering of some sort. These days? Join a Facebook group called "Get Rush Limbaugh to Leave the Country" or "1,000,000 Facebookers against Iraq." And that's it. Join, and you're done -- you've felt like you've added a voice. But to what?
Some of these groups actually have some meat behind them -- if the pages are sponsored by a specific non-profit. But have you really taken a close look? Most are nothing more than a page created by someone who cares about the issue -- which is admirable, but it isn't going to create any measurable result. Obama isn't going to be getting any morning briefs about Facebook pages. Well, he might -- but I think 1,000,000 angry progressives standing on the Mall would have a greater impact.
Meanwhile, the Tea Baggers --- I mean, Tea Partiers -- are getting the jump on us. They actually have rallies (lame as they are). Which gives the "news" media something to cover. Now of course I don't expect Faux News to cover a progressive rally -- except perhaps to make it look like it was an angry socialist mob coming to kill granny with their death squad -- but maybe the local news stations would. And it would make us visible to others.
But we don't. Somehow we've been brainwashed into inaction. Into thinking that joining some doofy group online means anything. It's a false sense of security, and we shouldn't allow ourselves to be mollified by it any longer.
Be loud, be proud, and let's show those Tea Party nutters what a REAL protest is like!
Yeah, where were we? Protesting has been the mainstay of the left since the 1960's. Heck, as recently as the 90's we were out there with our "No Blood for Oil" signs. But where are we now? Why, when so many critical issues are coming to a head, are we silent?
At first I thought that maybe we had just gotten too old as a generation -- that most of the GenXers (who carried on the mantle of the 60's hippies) had reached middle age and retired their protest signs. And that the Millenials were just too damned optimistic and naive to protest (and they are).
But that's not it. The real culprit is the rise of the internet and social networking. Back in the old days, the only way to commune with fellow lefties en masse was to attend a protest or gathering of some sort. These days? Join a Facebook group called "Get Rush Limbaugh to Leave the Country" or "1,000,000 Facebookers against Iraq." And that's it. Join, and you're done -- you've felt like you've added a voice. But to what?
Some of these groups actually have some meat behind them -- if the pages are sponsored by a specific non-profit. But have you really taken a close look? Most are nothing more than a page created by someone who cares about the issue -- which is admirable, but it isn't going to create any measurable result. Obama isn't going to be getting any morning briefs about Facebook pages. Well, he might -- but I think 1,000,000 angry progressives standing on the Mall would have a greater impact.
Meanwhile, the Tea Baggers --- I mean, Tea Partiers -- are getting the jump on us. They actually have rallies (lame as they are). Which gives the "news" media something to cover. Now of course I don't expect Faux News to cover a progressive rally -- except perhaps to make it look like it was an angry socialist mob coming to kill granny with their death squad -- but maybe the local news stations would. And it would make us visible to others.
But we don't. Somehow we've been brainwashed into inaction. Into thinking that joining some doofy group online means anything. It's a false sense of security, and we shouldn't allow ourselves to be mollified by it any longer.
Be loud, be proud, and let's show those Tea Party nutters what a REAL protest is like!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)